Contrast of leadership styles

If your employees lack skills and experience, use a coaching style to get them up to speed. The importance of the leadership strategies is also considerable as the different stakeholders need to take into account the different ways in which the organisation needs leadership, leading to higher productivity for their employees Boddy,Bogler,Kahai et al.

Compare and Contrast Leadership Styles Introduction The essay compares and contrasts the leadership styles and management of two very different companies.

Disadvantages Team members may feel that they have no responsibility and this could cause them to provide lack of creativity and initiative, because they are told to do it. People are unique no two are the same. Leadership Styles Managers exercise control over their employees, just as world leaders exert control over a country.

Big, medium or small size teams would be affected with punishments and motivated by rewards. The particular branch was highly bureaucratic in nature, and had a significant power culture which was based on hierarchy and control through authority at the branch. The text tells us the importance of communication among the organization and most important within the leadership.

Other leadership traits include the ability to communicate effectively, motivate others and multitask. Research in leadership style has been mostly subjugated to subordinate perceptions of leadership in decision making, interpersonal relations, planning, instructional leadership, and management efficiency.

But for smaller teams that should not be a problem and leader could have a less intense environment.

Contrast and compare leadership styles

For experienced members it could lead to competition for rewards between the experienced members and would result in outstanding display of performance. The manager at the store was generally happy with a flexible approach to the organisation. This branch was chosen due to accessibility.

In contrast, leadership traits describe the personality types of successful leaders. For both experienced and inexperienced team would be a good leadership to use, because it motivates and encourages members to stick with the rules and overall system. The structure at the store was also not highly bureaucratic, with small span of control at the store in Greenford.

Motivating team with rewards and having clear expectations of what should be done. The organisation also needs to ensure that it has the best possible communication tools, which can be undertaken in a manner which is acceptable to the different stakeholders and can therefore bring long term benefits for both the employees and the organisation.

Otherwise bureaucratic leader would have clear and fixed decisions based upon rules and guidelines that would be time efficient, but might not be the best way to solve the problem. The branch manager was happy to talk for the purposes of this essay, which is one of the defining characteristic of the research choice.

It is easier to send message across for small group of people. The leadership being willing to delegate responsibility and power to subordinates is one of the ways in which a company can make their employees more accountable and responsible, as they are given more flexibility and responsibility in their environment.

Leadership style refers to the actions leaders take to gather input from subordinates, make decisions, solve problems and review results.

Employees want empowerment, as they want to make more and more decisions about their futures. Lastly, I found through my sit-in on this other organization that leadership styles are fundamentally different. The organisation is one of the main vulnerary organisations in UK, and is responsible for the support of the various emergency response units for the public good Limericku and Mintalova,Davidson,Waikayi et al.

The conclusion then compares and contrasts the two leadership styles, summing up that the styles need to be different in accordance with the nature and needs of each organisation. The managers, during interviews were adamant that rules and procedures must be followed by the book, and there seems to be a focus on the needs of the organisation to have a clear hierarchy.

Becky Drake

Sadly, I found that many members were not invested to contribute ideas.Leadership Styles Karen Plascencia B2 Leadership style is the way a person leads others and the way they perform and impact others; either in a positive or negative way.

The leadership styles are: autocratic,democratic, and laissez-faire leaders. Autocratic leaders have a way of being more strict. There style has two major characteristics: it supports the status quo (in contrast to the transformational leadership style) and it tends to be (as its name suggests) about the deal.

This leadership style can work pretty well in business situations where one is using money. In exploring leadership styles, organizational culture can be a relevant driver of the leadership style. Organizational culture is "the set of key values, assumptions, understandings, and norms that is shared by members of an organization and taught to new members.

In contrast, leadership traits describe the characteristics and personality traits that are common among leaders or those in a position of authority. Leadership styles run the gamut from.

Video: Leadership Styles and Types: Authoritarian, Laissez-Faire & Democratic Most of us are members of many different social groups, and several of those groups have leaders.

Compare and Contrast Leadership Styles. Introduction. The essay compares and contrasts the leadership styles and management of two very different companies. The first organisation is Tesco .

Contrast of leadership styles
Rated 4/5 based on 83 review