But by the end of the book is where Paul ponders the most potent deliberation of the war. They would not be themselves—no, they would be changed people, molded into new men after the war. The soldiers are not only animal-like in the way that they reject human emotions and live completely in the present: The horrors of battle force the soldiers to develop animalistic instincts and a pack-like bond.
By this time, all of his comrades and classmates have been killed or died in hospitalization. All Quiet on the Western Front enacts a common theme portraying the effects of war on the characters and they moods they exhibit.
Remarque uses this consistency of the theme to dominate the overall composure and mood of the novel. War does that to people, and no one could really understand it as Paul an allusion to Remarque did; and he could not understand the people outside the war either, because he had grown so used to the war.
Most fictional autobiographies are narrated in the first-person singular, as the protagonist recounts his or her development from a child into an adult subject.
Further into the story the essence of the change in the soldiers is realized sharply by Paul, in two instances: The opening pages of All Quiet on the Western Front emphasize how war dissolves individual men into a single, collective identity.
The third-person plural resonates throughout this first chapter as the soldiers operate as a single unit, motivated by the same communal desires: This instance enlarges when they are entrusted on the battlefield.
The violent ways they struggle for power through the exercise of brute force also make them beastly. The first bomb, the first explosion, burst in our hearts. Moreover, when he is sent to a military hospital to recover from shrapnel wounds, Paul is given time to gain insight and contemplate over the effects and happenings of the war.
Human civilization is just a veneer, Kat argues, and humans have more in common with the animal kingdom than they would like to admit. The times where Paul is on duty at the front are the times where the most prominent changes occur between man and soldier. However, rather than show us how Paul grows as an individual, developing his own ideas and value system, the novel instead shows how Paul—along with his fellow soldiers—survives the war by doing precisely the opposite.
Paul Baumer is one of the foremost characters that display this example of change in a soldier, an unknown soldier—a soldier that represents the whole of the army. In war, that which makes a person human can cost a soldier his sanity, if not his life. Yet for Paul, the prospect of armistice does not seem to promise a return to the human community.
What would they come home to? Throughout the story his excursions in the war change him, and thus how the theme of the war affecting him comes into play.
Accordingly, this demonstrates how their continuous and at times calamitous efforts on the front seem to increase their mentality of experience in the war.
The war becomes the focal point of his universe, and his identity before or after becomes an irrelevant distraction. What unite the soldiers, the reader discovers, are not the head and the heart, but the stomach and the intestines—full bellies and general latrines. The inhumanity of man is a present cause to the effect of demoralization and apathy in a soldier, like Paul.
The only things that matter on the battlefield are the immediate physical stimuli: Paul insists earlier that they have been through so much turmoil that it seemed to have been that years had passed: All Quiet on the Western Front: We fly from ourselves.
The soldiers are but boys, prime in their instinct to just stay alive. We are cut off from activity, from striving, from progress. Paul essentially considers and believes that he is no different than these men, succumbed to the same war, the same distress and involuntary plunder of hope from their lives 1.
There is no place for individuals in war, and therefore no place for a traditional coming-of-age tale. The realization of a fragmented future becomes existent in their minds. In All Quiet on the Western Front, Remarque utilizes the change war makes on the soldiers in the story as an apparent and consistent theme throughout the story that plays a dramatic role in the growth of the characters.
Every second on the front a soldier must fight against the physical threats that fly amuck everywhere to take a life. We were eighteen and had begun to love life and the world; and we had to shoot it to pieces. That is long ago.A suggested list of literary criticism on Erich Maria Remarque's All Quiet on the Western Front.
The listed critical essays and books will be invaluable for writing essays and papers on All Quiet on the Western Front. All Quiet on the Western Front: Literary Analysis Erich Maria Remarque’s novel depicting the horrors of the First World War, All Quiet on the Western Front, known to be his greatest work, is a piece rife with hidden meanings and symbols.
Free Essay: All Quiet on the Western Front Erich Maria Remarque’s literary breakthrough, All Quiet on the Western Front, describes two stories. It.
The book, All Quiet on the Western Front, was a very shocking book because it shows the reader what World War I was like from a German soldier, Paul Baumer’s, point of view. The author, Erich Maria Remarque, is trying to get across to the reader that war is not a fun game.
War is serious. If a. The earth, as in the soil beneath our feet, is taken for granted every single day, but never by a soldier on the front lines. Erich Maria Remarque explains this through his character Paul Bäumer in the excerpt of his novel All Quiet on the Western Front.
Essay: All Quiet on the Western Front An anti-war novel often portrays many of the bad aspects and consequences of war.
Erich Remarques All Quiet on the Western Front is a novel set in the First World War that is against war. Remarque describes the terrible reality of the war, focusing on the horrors and involved.Download